Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of different specimen preparation methods for the diagnosis of lung cancer from LNs (nā€‰=ā€‰213)

From: Clinical values of different specimen preparation methods for the diagnosis of lung cancer by EBUS-TBNA

 

Sensitivity, % (95% CI)

Specificity, % (95% CI)

PPV, % (95% CI)

NPV, %

(95% CI)

Diagnostic accuracy, % (95% CI)

Ļ‡2

pā€‰value

HP

89.0(83.4ā€“93.3)

100(91.2ā€“100)

100

67.8(57.9ā€“76.3)

91.1(86.4ā€“94.5)

  

TSC

83.8(77.5ā€“88.9)

95.0(83.1ā€“99.4)

98.6(94.9ā€“99.6)

57.6(49.0-65.7)

85.9(80.5ā€“90.3)

  

LBC

80.3(73.6ā€“86.0)

97.5(86.8ā€“99.9)

99.3(95.2ā€“99.9)

53.3(45.8ā€“60.9)

83.6(77.9ā€“88.3)

5.51ā–¼

0.064ā–¼

HPā€‰+ā€‰TSC

97.1(93.3ā€“99.1)

95.0(83.1ā€“99.4)

98.8(95.6ā€“99.7)

86.4(76.2ā€“94.8)

96.2(93.3ā€“98.7)

21.15ā˜…

0.000ā˜…

HPā€‰+ā€‰LBC

94.8(90.4ā€“97.6)

97.5(86.8ā€“99.9)

99.4(95.9ā€“99.9)

81.2(69.6ā€“89.1)

95.3(91.5ā€“97.7)

18.03ā– 

0.000ā– 

HPā€‰+ā€‰TSCā€‰+ā€‰LBC

98.3(95.0-99.6)

92.5(79.6ā€“98.4)

98.3(95.0-99.4)

92.5(80.0-97.4)

97.2(94.0ā€“99.0)

1.04ā–³, 24.69ā–½

0.595ā–³, 0.000ā–½

  1. Abbreviations; PPVā€‰=ā€‰Positive predictive value, NPVā€‰=ā€‰Negative predictive value
  2. ā–¼Comparison of diagnostic accuracy among HP, TSC and LBC;
  3. ā˜…Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between combination of the two specimen preparation methods (HPā€‰+ā€‰TSC) and any single specimen preparation method
  4. ā– Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between combination of the two specimen preparation methods (HPā€‰+ā€‰LBC) and any single specimen preparation method
  5. ā–³Comparison of diagnostic accuracy among combination of the three specimen preparation methods and combination of the two specimen preparation methods
  6. ā–½Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between combination of the three specimen preparation methods and any single specimen preparation method