Skip to main content

Case report: Rare myeloid sarcoma development following renal transplantation with KRAS and DNMT3A gene mutations

Abstract

Background

A high incidence of malignant tumors, such as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD), Kaposi sarcoma, and renal cancer is common in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients. However, myeloid sarcoma (MS) after renal transplantation has rarely been reported and the diagnosis is challenging due to its low incidence.

Case presentation

Here, we report a rare case of a 49-year-old man who developed myeloid sarcoma (MS) in the transplanted kidney two years after renal transplantation. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) showed mutations of KRAS and DNMT3A genes in the MS, and no gene mutations in the bone marrow. He presented a normal karyotype of 46, XY. Following treatment with 6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy, the patient was in satisfactory condition with stable serum creatinine (sCr) levels at the 1-year follow-up. In addition, we performed a detailed review with emphasis on the clinical manifestations, and the diagnostic and therapeutic processes of another 7 patients who developed MS following renal transplantation.

Conclusions

Our report illustrates the clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling in benefiting the diagnosis of MS, the selection of therapeutic strategy and the determination of whether MS is donor-derived.

Background

An increased risk of secondary malignant tumors threatens the life of solid organ transplant recipients, which is mainly attributed to immune deficiency due to immunosuppressive therapy after transplantation and chronic viral infections [1]. Donor-derived malignancies occur in a small amount of recipients [2]. MS is a rare myeloid neoplasm characterized as an extramedullary soft tissue mass, which can occur as de novo tumor, recurrent acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MPN/MDS [3]. The most common involved sites of MS include lymph nodes, skin and soft tissues, bone, testes, peritoneum and gastrointestinal tract [4]. MS derived from transplanted kidney has only been reported in few cases. It is challenging to diagnose de novo MS, especially in patients without a history of hematologic malignancy or when MS involves unusual sites.

The mutation spectrum of MS is generally consistent with that in acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) [5]. RAS pathway mutation and DNMT3A are common in myeloid neoplasms, especially in AML [6]. Furthermore, it has been revealed that RTK-RAS pathway mutation is more enriched in MS than AML and may contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of MS [7]. Hence, the application of comprehensive genomic profiling is helpful for the diagnosis of MS and the selection of optimal therapeutic strategies. Here we report 1 case of renal MS post-renal transplantation with KRAS and DNMT3A mutations. We also identified another 7 cases in the literature which highlight that molecular genotyping analyses are helpful to develop target therapeutic strategy and determine whether MS is donor-derived or as a secondary tumor in association with iatrogenic immunosuppression and chronic viral infections.

Case presentation

The patient was a 49-year-old man with chronic renal insufficiency. He underwent right renal transplantation in the Chinese People's Armed Police Force General Hospital in November 2016. Following transplantation, the patient underwent immunosuppression therapy, which included tacrolimus, prednisone, and myfortic, resulting in the return of normal renal function in the patient.

Two years later, the level of sCr in the patient gradually increased from normal to 274 mmol/L during routine laboratory testing. Enhanced MRI demonstrated multiple, variably sized quasi-circular lesions with slightly short signal intensity on T1WI, slightly long signal intensity on T2WI, and high signal intensity on DWI. The larger size lesion was about 4.66 cm by 3.10 cm (Fig. 1). PET-CT revealed a soft tissue mass in the pelvis of the transplanted kidney (with an elevated SUV of 2.6), and multiple metastatic hypermetabolic soft tissue density nodules can be observed in the parenchyma of the transplanted kidney (with a maximum SUV of 2.9). No metastatic hypermetabolic lesions were observed in any other parts of the body.

Fig. 1
figure1

Enhanced MRI demonstrated multiple, variably sized quasi-circular lesions with slightly short signal intensity on T1WI, slightly long signal intensity on T2WI, and high signal intensity on DWI. The larger size lesion was about 4.66 cm by 3.10 cm

A puncture biopsy of the transplanted kidney was performed, and the results indicated large neoplastic cells. The immunohistochemistry examination revealed the following: CD34 (few +), CD68 (KP1) (few +), CD163 (-), lysozyme (few +), MPO (+), Ki-67 (>70% +), CD3 (few +), CD20 (-), TdT (few +), CD15 (-), CD117 (+), FISH: EBER(-). Bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of leukemic infiltration (Fig. 2), with normal chromosomes (46, XY). Examinations of fusion genes for both acute lymphoblastic leukemia and myeloid leukemia were negative. NGS examinations of the transplanted kidney was performed on 34 commonly mutated genes in AML (listed in Supplementary Table) and showed mutations of KRAS (NM_004985:exon2:c.G35A:p.G12Drs121913529), DNMT3A (NM_022552:exon15:c.1675delT:p.C559fs) , and no gene mutations in the bone marrow. Eventually, the patient was diagnosed with de novo MS in the transplanted kidney. Detailed information on the donor was not available, but the other transplant recipient did not have any problems in the transplanted kidney.

Fig. 2
figure2

Bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of leukemic infiltration (original magnification, × 400)

The patient underwent systemic chemotherapy in our hospital in October 2019, and received DA regimen chemotherapy (daunorubicin 100 mg on days 1-3 and cytarabine 170 mg on days 1-7). The patient responded well to the treatment, and the size of the mass in the transplanted kidney decreased and the level of sCr decreased to 192 mmol/L. The patient underwent a second cycle of DA regimen chemotherapy 30 days later. The size of the biggest lesion decreased to 2.5cm by 1.8cm, but the level of sCr remained at around 180 mmol/L. Therefore, we changed the chemotherapy regimen to cytarabine 2.5 g every 12h on days 1, 3, and 5, and etoposide 100 mg on days 1-3 for 3 cycles. However, 3 days after the 5th cycle of the revised chemotherapy regimen, the patient presented with progressive generalized motor weakness and slurred speech, without headache and vomiting, and the patient couldn’t stand and walk without assistance. A routine blood test showed WBC 4×109/L, NEUT 3.84×109/L, HGB 94.3 g/L, and PLT 44×109/L. The patient’s liver function, serum ions, and other metabolic panels were within normal limits, except that the level of sCr was 157 mmol/L. Head CT and MRI did not show any new abnormal acute findings, and it was presumed that the neurologic symptoms experienced by the patient were a result of cytarabine neurotoxicity. Thereafter the patient was treated with prednisone 40 mg twice a day for 3 days, which led to a significant improvement in his symptoms. After recovering from the neurologic symptoms, the patient refused to continue chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The patient was followed up on April 20, 2021 and he could speak fluently, but sometimes walked with an unsteady step. The size of the biggest lesion in the transplanted kidney decreased to 1.7 cm and the level of sCr was maintained at around 200mol/L.

Discussion

It is difficult to diagnose de novo MS, especially in patients without a history of hematologic malignancy or when MS manifests in unusual sites, so a high index of suspicion is needed. If a diagnosis of MS is suspected, performing immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, cytogenetic, and molecular studies is critical. From the morphological point of view, MS is easily confused with lymphoma, small round blue cell tumor, and medulloblastoma. So the diagnosis of MS depends mainly on immunohistochemistry examination. The most commonly expressed immunohistochemistry markers include CD68-KP1, myeloperoxidase, CD117, CD99, CD68/PG-M1, lysozyme, CD34, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, CD56, CD61, CD30, glycophorin A, and CD4 [8]. B and T cell markers, such as CD3, CD4, CD20, and CD79a should be examined to differentiate MS from non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

When there is a diagnostic dilemma between MS and other diseases based on morphological and immunhistochemical feature, the application of comprehensive genomic profiling is helpful for the diagnosis of MS, since MS shares the same mutation spectrum as AML. In the case reported herein, the mutations detected in KRAS and DNMT3A, which are considered as important pathogenetic factors in AML, supported the diagnosis of MS.

Furthermore, the clinical use of molecular genotyping analyses is also helpful to guide target therapeutic strategy. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed using the MeSH terms (“kidney transplantation” and “Myeloid Sarcoma”) and (“Myeloid Sarcoma post-renal transplantation”). The search returned 7 cases of MS in post-renal transplantation patients; their clinical manifestations, diagnostic information, and therapeutic processes are presented in Table 1. FISH or molecular genotyping analyses has been systematically applied to the analysis of MS in five patients. Three patients of them were confirmed positive for PML-RARα gene rearrangements through FISH and gained the treatment of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). So, molecular genotyping analyses are essential to both the diagnosis and the treatment of MS in post-renal transplantation patients.

Table 1 Baseline disease characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of MS cases following renal transplantation in the literature review

The exact mechanism of MS in transplant recipients is still unclear. DNA damage resulting from prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive drug may be one reason [15]. Another risk factor is the chronic viral infection. Donor-derived MS can be either due to direct transmission of malignant hematopoietic stem cells from the donor to the recipient during transplantation, or due to the malignant transformation of donor-derived nonmalignant hematopoietic stem cells in the recipient [16]. For donor-derived MS without systemic involvement, reduction or cessation of immunosuppressive agents and transplant nephrectomy may be sufficient. Therefore, determining whether MS is donor-derived may be helpful for the treatment [10]. There are four patients listed in Table 1 were confirmed that the malignant cells were of donor origin through the use of molecular genotyping analyses.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we report a rare case of a 49-year-old man with MS in the transplanted kidney and another 7 MS cases post-renal transplantation were reviewed. Although MS rarely occurs in the transplanted kidney, a high index of suspicion is needed. If a diagnosis of MS is suspected, performing immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, cytogenetic, and molecular studies is critical for confirming the diagnosis. Concurrently, comprehensive genomic profiling is also helpful to determine whether MS is donor-derived and guide target therapeutic strategies.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material were presented in this published article.

Abbreviations

PTLD:

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders

MS:

Myeloid sarcoma

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

sCr:

Serum creatinine

APL:

Acute promyelocytic leukemia

AML:

Acute myelocytic leukemia

MPN:

Myeloproliferative neoplasm

MDS:

Myelodysplastic syndrome

ATRA:

All-trans retinoic acid; ATO: arsenic trioxide;

References

  1. 1.

    Yunus M, Aziz T, Mubarak M. Posttransplant malignancies in renal transplant recipients: 22-years experience from a single center in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(2):575–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kauffman HM, McBride MA, Cherikh WS, Spain PC, Delmonico FL. Transplant tumor registry: donors with central nervous system tumors1. Transplantation. 2002;73(4):579–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Almond LM, Charalampakis M, Ford SJ, Gourevitch D, Desai A. Myeloid Sarcoma: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17(5):263–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kawamoto K, Miyoshi H, Yoshida N, Takizawa J, Sone H, Ohshima K. Clinicopathological, Cytogenetic, and Prognostic Analysis of 131 Myeloid Sarcoma Patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(11):1473–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kashofer K, Gornicec M, Lind K, Caraffini V, Schauer S, Beham-Schmid C, et al. Detection of prognostically relevant mutations and translocations in myeloid sarcoma by next generation sequencing. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59(2):501–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ward AF, Braun BS, Shannon KM. Targeting oncogenic Ras signaling in hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2012;120(17):3397–406.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Choi M, Jeon YK, Sun CH, Yun HS, Hong J, Shin DY, et al. RTK-RAS pathway mutation is enriched in myeloid sarcoma. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8(5):43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Magdy M, Abdel Karim N, Eldessouki I, Gaber O, Rahouma M, Ghareeb M. Myeloid Sarcoma. Oncol Res Treat. 2019;42(4):224–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    AlGhunaim M, AlSuwaida A, Zaidi SN, Kfoury H. First case report of acute myeloid sarcoma post renal transplant. Transplant Proc. 2014;46(7):2411–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Palanisamy A, Persad P, Koty PP, Douglas LL, Stratta RJ, Rogers J, et al. Donor-derived myeloid sarcoma in two kidney transplant recipients from a single donor. Case Rep Nephrol. 2015;2015:821346.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shen J, Du X, Diao X, Zhao L, Wang W, Yu Y, et al. Myeloid Sarcoma Presenting With Multiple Skin and Subcutaneous Mass Without Leukemic Manifestations After Renal Transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2015;47(7):2227–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ying L, Tian L, Xie Y, Wang Q, Che X, Yan J, et al. A case of ureteral myeloid sarcoma post-renal transplantation. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wong RL, Ketcham M, Irwin T, Akilesh S. Donor-derived acute promyelocytic leukemia presenting as myeloid sarcoma in a transplanted kidney. Leukemia. 2020;34(10):2776–9.

  14. 14.

    Williams T, Aljitawi OS, Moussa R, McHugh S, Dusing R, Abraha J, et al. First case of donor transmitted non-leukemic promyelocytic sarcoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53(12):2530–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Quinlan SC, Morton LM, Pfeiffer RM, Anderson LA, Landgren O, Warren JL, et al. Increased risk for lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms in elderly solid-organ transplant recipients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(5):1229–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Girsberger S, Wehmeier C, Amico P, Dirnhofer S, Marti E, Halter J, et al. Donor-derived acute myeloid leukemia in a kidney transplant recipient. Blood. 2013;122(2):298–300.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Danyang Wu and Xiaoxuan Lu are co-first authors for this study

Funding

This work was supported by Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program under grant XLYC1807265.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors were involved in the clinical care on the patient. Danyang Wu performed the literature review and was the major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication. All authors are in agreement for the publication of the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary table 1

: Next generation sequencing (NGS) assay of 34 commonly mutated genes in AML/MPN/MDS.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, D., Lu, X., Yan, X. et al. Case report: Rare myeloid sarcoma development following renal transplantation with KRAS and DNMT3A gene mutations. Diagn Pathol 16, 82 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13000-021-01141-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Myeloid sarcoma
  • Renal transplantation
  • KRAS
  • DNMT3A
  • Case report